July 14th, 2026

What I worked on:

  • Finished reading up on Topological cyclic homology
    • Worked up to a sketch of Topological Hochschild Homology
      • in the Nikolaus-Scholze definition of cylotomic spectra, no equivariant homotopy theory is needed which differs from previous definitions
      • the definition of THH is given as follows
        \begin{align*} THH(\mathcal{C})_n = \text{colim}\left(\bigotimes_{0 \leq i \leq n} \text{map}_{\mathcal{C}}(x_i, x_{i+1})\right) \end{align*}
      • to understand this definition of THH we need to understand the colimit, to do this we need the following steps:
        • we need to construct a functor:
          \begin{align*} (\mathcal{C}^{\backsimeq})^{n+1} \to \text{Sp} \end{align*}
          • then we need to lift the map $n \mapsto THH(\mathcal{C})_n$ to a functor $\Lambda^{op} \to \text{Sp}$ from Conne's cyclic category such that the face and degeneracy maps are given by composing adjacent morphisms and by inserting identities.
          • Lastly, you want to construct the cycolotmic Frobenius maps, which are defined in the paper I read yesterday
      • Also read through a computation of $THH(\mathbb{Z}/p^n)$ for all $n$. This can be found in Krause-Nikolaus.
  • Continued reading about limit sets and its properties
    • classified the elementary subgroups of $Isom(\mathbb{H}^n)$
    • learned about minimal actions in the context of $\Gamma$ acting on its limit set $\Lambda(\Gamma)$. A minimal action means that $\Lambda(\Gamma)$ has no invariant non-empty proper closed subset
      • showed that if $\Gamma$ is not elementary then its action on $\Lambda(\Gamma)$ is minimal.
        • a corollary of this result is that if $\Gamma$ is not elementary and $\Gamma'$ is an infinite normal subgroup of $\Gamma$ then their two limit sets are eaqual.
        • the proof of this theorem relied on the fact that a convex hull $C(S)$ always exists for any closed subset $S \subset \overline{\mathbb{H}^n}$.
  • Read Folland
    • finished section 4.1 on Topological spaces. Learned about the Kuratowski closure operator $(-^*)$ and showed that for any subset $A \subset X$, $A^*$ is its closure.
    • started on continuity, not many interesting results but tomorrow I get to prove my favorite result, which is the Urysohn lemma